Navy Tables vs the RDP — Differences Explained

Watch Will Welbourn tie the entire decompression theory series together — explaining the key differences between the US Navy tables and the RDP, why those differences affect repetitive dive planning, and why pressure groups are never interchangeable between tables.

Watch the full series first This video ties together everything from the previous four. Half times, compartments, M-values, and surface interval credit must all be understood before the Navy vs RDP differences make sense.

The US Navy Tables

The first widely-used recreational dive tables were adapted from the US Navy tables, developed in the 1950s. They used six compartments, with a slowest half time of 120 minutes.

For the surface interval credit calculation, the Navy used the slowest compartment — 120 minutes — as the basis. This meant a diver was not considered clear of residual nitrogen until 12 hours after a dive (6 × 120 minutes). It also meant repetitive dive planning was based on worst-case assumptions for all compartments.

The Navy test subjects were all male, in their 20s and 30s, and physically fit. The pass/fail criterion was simple: bends or no bends.

Why the RDP Was Developed

In the mid-1980s, Dr. Raymond Rogers recognised that the Navy tables were not ideal for recreational divers. Three specific problems motivated a new approach:

  • The 120-minute surface interval credit was appropriate for decompression diving, but excessively conservative for recreational no-stop diving.
  • The Navy test subjects did not reflect recreational divers — who include women, older divers, and people of varying fitness levels.
  • New Doppler ultrasound technology revealed that silent bubbles were forming at Navy table limits even without observable DCS symptoms — suggesting the M-values were set too high for recreational divers.

How the RDP Was Built

With the help of DSAT (Diving Science and Technology), Dr. Rogers developed the RDP. It was formally tested in 1987–88 at the Institute of Applied Physiology and Medicine, with Dr. Michael Powell as principal investigator.

US Navy TablesRDP
Compartments614
Slowest half time120 minutes480 minutes
Surface interval credit120-minute gas washout60-minute gas washout
Time to be "clean"12 hours6 hours
M-valuesHigher (original Haldane)Lower (Spencer limits — Doppler data)
Test subjectsMale, 20s–30s, fitBroad range — reflects recreational divers
Test criteriaBends / no bendsDoppler-detectable bubbles
Dive profiles testedSingle-depthMulti-level; up to 4 dives/day for 6 days

The Practical Effect — Shorter Surface Intervals, Longer Repetitive Dives

Because the RDP's 60-minute gas washout assumes nitrogen clears faster than the Navy's 120-minute washout, the RDP calculates that less residual nitrogen remains after a surface interval. The result:

  • The RDP allows shorter surface intervals to achieve the same pressure group reduction.
  • The RDP allows longer repetitive dive times for the same surface interval.
Pressure groups are NOT interchangeable between tables Because the RDP and Navy tables use different surface interval credit systems and different M-values, a pressure group from one table cannot be used with the other. The calculations will be wrong. This is one of the most commonly tested points in the PADI RDP exam — expect at least one question on it.

RDP Versions

The RDP was produced in multiple formats — the printed table version (because that is what divers were familiar with) and the multilevel electronic planner, the eRDPML (originally the Wheel), which enables multi-level dive profile planning. DSAT also produced four nitrox tables: for EANx32, EANx36, an Equivalent Air Depth table, and an Oxygen Exposure table.

Pressure groups within the RDP family are interchangeable The table version and the eRDPML use the same underlying model, so pressure groups can be carried between them. You cannot, however, carry an RDP pressure group to any other manufacturer's table or older Navy tables.